This post contains mild spoilers that range across all 5 series of Dr Who since it started in 2005.
Under the influence of Russell T. Davies, Dr Who was fab in more ways than one. Under Steven Moffat it’s a riot in a good way. I can’t be the first person, however, to feel that the 5th series of Dr Who lost something in the transition. This feels really odd to me, primarily because all of my favourite episodes from the first 4 series (with the notable exception of Midnight) have been written by Steven Moffat.
One thing is clear, Steven is a MUCH funnier writer than Russell and his episodes have a mechanical intelligence that far surpass all the other writers to have worked on the show since 2005. But something fundamental is definitely missing, or at least is not as ubiquitous under Moffat.
Obviously I’m grateful to Steven Moffat for a great number of things since he took over: first off only a single episode in the 5th series was set in London, which is an 86% decrease on the previous minimum by my count. What’s also nice is that Steven Moffat doesn’t have a hugely pervasive social agenda that he’s trying to push*; he just wants to tell great and entertaining stories and Dr Who is a marvellous platform for a storyteller such as Moffat. If you want the difference in their relationships in a nutshell, I would have to say that Dr Who, under Davies, was a comic drama, while under Moffat it’s a dramatic comedy.
What I feel is definitely missing, then, is the huge wealth of emotional intelligence that Russell brought to the show. I know this sounds weird, and I am male, at least I was the last time I checked, but I like to cry when it gets sad. Russell was great at this as someone he knows instinctively how to pull at the heartstrings, a particularly wonderful example is when Rose gets trapped in the parallel universe at the end of Doomsday, another is when the Doctor must erase all of Donna’s memories at the end of Journey’s End. It’s not that Moffat isn’t capable of this as we saw with his portrayal of the relationship between Reinette and the Doctor in The Girl In The Fireplace, but sometimes it feels like he can be too clever for his own good. That’s not a criticism I want addressed, but Steven has a wonderful habit of putting his characters in situations that are so impossible to get out of, that the only way to get out of them is to do something perfect, and by doing something perfect, everything ends up working out fine. Job done. On to the next problem. Something you found a lot in Russell’s episodes was that things tended to get quite messy. It’s not a coincidence that the phrase, almost a catchphrase for the series in fact, “I’m sorry, I’m so sorry…” barely gets mentioned in the 5th series.
And the funny thing is, is that you can’t even imagine the Eleventh Doctor saying it so sincerely. Matt Smith is extremely entertaining and he plays the Doctor wonderfully well, helped in no small part by the hilarious Steven Moffat, but emotionally he seems restricted to anger, wonderment, pride and frustration (plus some others but these are the main ones). He certainly doesn’t do compassion or humility in quite the same way as David Tennant did. Again this is not a criticism I want addressed, because I think this particular Doctor has a lot of mysterious energy that the Ninth and Tenth Doctors didn’t quite have, but, along with Steven Moffat’s writing, this goes some way to identify what’s been lost in the aforementioned transition.
In a way, this post is responding to the reported loss in viewing figures for the new Season: down 1.2 million from a strong average of 7.2 million while David Tennant was the Doctor. So I’ve argued that there’s been a significant, perceptible reduction in the emotional heft that we’ve been used to in Dr Who, which poses the question: why am I so hopeful about the series’ continuation? Because I honestly believe that Steven Moffat is genuinely capable of the same kind of heft that Davies was, it’s just that I feel Moffat’s style is a much more slow-burning breed of storytelling. As if his method is like carbohydrates as opposed to Davies’ fat and sugar…. umm… illustrative yet unfortunate analogy. If there were not already evidence obvious enough for this, I would point directly to the fact that the series never conclusively ended; as if The Big Bang was just the mid-season cliffhanger. I have a huge amount of faith in Steven Moffat, I sincerely hope that my faith isn’t misplaced, although that certainly wouldn’t stop me watching.
*I’ve mentioned that RTD had a social agenda he was pushing during his time as lead writer on Dr Who and you may disagree with this for a variety of reasons. I should point out though that I didn’t say it was unwelcome or harmful in any regard but seriously, I haven’t seen a more blatant agenda since a few seconds ago when I looked at the calendar on my wall. If you watched the first 4 series (as of 2005) of Dr Who and didn’t spot anything like what I’m suggesting, don’t worry about it, it really isn’t that important.

5 comments
Comments feed for this article
November 17, 2010 at 12:47 am
kintarly
I agree entirely with you on this. I myself tend to lean in favoritism towards Moffat…I feel that Davies is more repetative and predictable (with the exception of midnight, which was probably one of my most favorite episodes).
January 2, 2011 at 3:05 pm
2010 in review « Chris Hemmens' Blog
[...] The busiest day of the year was July 4th with 89 views. The most popular post that day was Davies vs. Moffat. [...]
September 15, 2011 at 7:20 am
Hamish
There are few (if any) episodes written by Davies that I could say I like, the first series was mediocre and it just went downhill from there (do not get me thinking about series four or onwards, the end of time- what was that BS?) I just find a lot of it dumb and a terrible example of Science Fiction (for some reason I still tune into Doctor Who every week). The fifth series is probably one of the best things that has happened to doctor who, it was funny and it was cleverly written, I allow the second episode as my only exception to this. But then came the sixth season, after a promising two-part premiere the writing crashed and so did my expectations, it became too intricate and the dialogue was hopeless, the only exception to this could be the brilliant work of Neil Gaiman, all I can hope for is a good season finish which is something I can always expect from Doctor Who now, even after Davies left me feeling slightly betrayed.
October 11, 2011 at 1:27 am
cb
Sorry. I am completely missing Russell T. Davies. I think my real problem with this current series is the choice of companion. I am not a big fan of the Amy Pond character. To me she lacks the substance of the last companions. I love Rory and River Song. I miss how Russell T. Davies tied the stories and history together. I miss seeing Jack Harkness drop in every once in a while. It just seems as if he started a whole new show with the same name.
October 25, 2011 at 1:48 pm
peter
i agree